Radiohalo dating updating xbox to play avi
If it weren’t for the fact that the Bible teaches it, they probably wouldn’t have any problem with a global flood on earth.This demonstrates again how the biases of scientists affect their interpretation of the evidence.presents what it claims is evidence for vast time spans.This is graphically illustrated in a chart on pages 36–37: man’s existence is in such a tiny segment at the end of a 5-billion-year time-line that it has to be diagrammatically magnified twice to show up.However, modern historical geology grew out of this general ‘slow and gradual’ principle, which is still the predominantly preferred framework of explanation for any geological formation.
However, evolutionists point to dating methods that allegedly support deep time. This is accurately described on page 35 of Some elements, such as uranium, undergo radioactive decay to produce other elements.
Many organisms would have been buried very quickly and fossilized.
Also, recent catastrophes show that violent events like the flood described in Genesis could form many rock layers very quickly. Helens eruption in Washington state produced 25 feet (7.6 meters) of finely layered sediment in a And a rapidly pumped sand slurry was observed to deposit 3 to 4 feet (about 1 meter) of fine layers on a beach over an area the size of a football field.
So when we start from the bias that the Bible is God’s Word and is thus true, we can derive reasonable interpretations of the data.
Not that every problem has been solved, but many of them have been. It clearly couldn’t have been buried slowly, but must have been buried quickly by sediments carried by water.
We have already discussed how different biases can result in different that it must have always occurred slowly.